Skip to main content
You are the owner of this article.
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit

LATEST

Oklahoma State Question 790 fails

State Question 790

Workers remove a monument of the Ten Commandments from the Oklahoma State Capitol Oct. 2015 in accordance with Article 2, Section 5 of the Oklahoma constitution. Proposed State Question 790 attempts to repeal the article and restore the monument.

State Question 790 failed on the ballot Nov. 8, leaving Oklahoma's relationship between church and state unchanged.

The proposal, created in response to the removal of the Ten Commandments monument from the grounds of the Oklahoma Capitol, would have repealed article 2, section 5 of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma if it had passed. Article 2, section 5 prevents religious monuments from being placed on public grounds and precludes religious organizations from taking part in public programs to the same degree as non-religious organizations. 

Opponents of SQ 790 say it would have resulted in too close a relationship between religion and government, creating and strengthening sectarian lines along faith among Oklahomans. In addition to faith-based societal strain, there were fears that educational funding, already in short supply, would be distributed to religious teaching organizations as well, leaving less for public schools. 

Opponents of SQ 790 are also quick to point out, that even if the question did pass, it is likely that federal lawsuits would follow. The federal government draws a hard line between church and state, and any law made on a local level is superseded by it.

OU Daily standards

See an error? Earning trust is our duty. We correct errors atop stories. Identify an error, request a takedown or get in touch.

Independent and free since 1916: OU is committed to our editorial independence. You can help ensure our reporting remains strong and accessible to all invested in OU and Norman.

Want to comment? We value dialogue on issues we cover. On our social media accounts, we moderate disparagements, arguments and attacks, including those directed at our staff — and ban those repeatedly failing civility. The editor considers guest column submissions.