I disagree with Mr Kenney because Zelaya and some aides stated clearly that the constitution should be modified in some articles and they never denied that these were the ones that explicitely forbid reelection,whether continuos or alternate. His intentions were clear:he and his group wanted to change the constitution,and maybe right in some aspects,beeing this a political nature,the referendum had to be done thru the proper channel:The Electoral Supreme Court. He wanted to do it his way in disrespect of the rule of law in a clear Macho Chavez style.
Posted on September 8 at 5:10 p.m.Suggest removal
I disagree with Mr Kenney because Zelaya and some aides stated clearly that the constitution should be modified in some articles and they never denied that these were the ones that explicitely forbid reelection,whether continuos or alternate.
His intentions were clear:he and his group wanted to change the constitution,and maybe right in some aspects,beeing this a political nature,the referendum had to be done thru the proper channel:The Electoral Supreme Court.
He wanted to do it his way in disrespect of the rule of law in a clear Macho Chavez style.
On