86.0
Saturday, May 26, 2012

Comments by

Page 1 of 1

Posted on November 11 at 11:13 a.m.Suggest removal

The amount of research and forethought that was put into this article is literally astounding.

Did you even attempt to verify any of the accusations you leveled against WGSSA, a non-profit STUDENT organization on campus that's annual budget is most likely less than $200? Did you even ask one of the organization's members where the funds for their supplies/kazoos actually came from? (Their own pockets, by the way). Did you even attempt to start a dialogue with the student activists on the South Oval last week, or check out their table where a donation box to raise funds for the Women's Resource Center was PROMINENTLY displayed?

The daily should be embarrassed by the lack of quality and journalistic integrity that this "article" displays. I hope next time this author writes, he decides to utilize actual facts rather than trumped up fictional accusations.

On

Posted on March 8 at 11:13 a.m.Suggest removal

I agree that the Daily's deluge of articles, criticisms and condemnations about a few hippie protesters occupying space on the South Oval has done little except to demonstrate its almost complete obsolescence. In particular, Max Avery's management of the Opinion section has proven to be nothing more than sensationalist and amateur. Great job. You all are a complete joke.

On

Page 1 of 1