Posted on March 12 at 11:37 a.m.Suggest removal

This is absolutely dead on.

On

Posted on February 24 at 3:23 p.m.Suggest removal

We need more writing like this: a topic that is actually interesting, and an engaging, reasoned take on that topic.

Two thumbs up.

On

Posted on November 17 at 4:33 p.m.Suggest removal

Are students a drag, or are the pathetic opponents they are forced to watch come through Owen Field week after week a drag?

Are students a drag, or are the rest of the fans, who leave (particularly last weekend) at a rate exactly equal to the students, a drag?

Are students a drag, or is this team a drag?

On

Posted on November 12 at 5:48 p.m.Suggest removal

"This new system, which includes the enrollment modules people are frustrated with, is a suite of products developed outside of OU and employed at over 1,100 Universities nationwide."

Oh, that explains it. Since 1,100 universities are dumb enough to pay for this junk, we should too! The enroll portion of o-zone is indefensibly bad. I agree with JJanowiak- to attempt to placate the user base with promises of minor tweaks is absolutely insulting.

"However, there are so many other things oZONE offers (outside of the enroll aspect) in the way of infrastructure, added features, and options for the future that the old system couldn't. It will just take a little time to put it all together in a pretty package."

This is similarly insulting. Rather than continuously claiming that o-zone offers ambiguously-detailed pluses, give us specific reasons why our money was well spent on a product that, to the end user, offers nothing but headaches.

Perhaps the money spent on pretty ads featuring oddly unnecessary pictures of students could have been better allocated to a pr firm capable of providing us with real answers.

On