"The DNA sequence is never read or interpreted as information at this level."
This is false.
There are all kinds of proteins that read information from different parts of the primary structure besides the bases themselves. This isn't very new in the literature either. In fact, your monkey punching argument dates to about the same time as your understanding of DNA. They did the experiment on that too, and like in real life, there were actual factors (that means not imaginary) that had terribly entropic effects on the keyboards and the computers. It involved a lot of dung and piss and destruction of the machinery eons earlier than even a meaningfull sentence was produced. So the analogy you're reffering to describes what happens at the molecular level perfectly as organizations of amino acids and metabolic balances are smashed to oblivion by natural forces eons before they would have enough tries to fit any pattern you would call life.
I would submit that someone claiming an "understanding" of all the proposed contradictory mechanisms of evolution would in fact prevent you from obtaining anything better than a tangential understanding of microbiology. I would counter that nothing about evolution makes sense in the light of biology.
Evolution = change happens. See, it predicts everything, what a powerful theory.
Posted on October 1 at 10:15 p.m.Suggest removal
"The DNA sequence is never read or interpreted as information at this level."
This is false.
There are all kinds of proteins that read information from different parts of the primary structure besides the bases themselves. This isn't very new in the literature either. In fact, your monkey punching argument dates to about the same time as your understanding of DNA. They did the experiment on that too, and like in real life, there were actual factors (that means not imaginary) that had terribly entropic effects on the keyboards and the computers. It involved a lot of dung and piss and destruction of the machinery eons earlier than even a meaningfull sentence was produced. So the analogy you're reffering to describes what happens at the molecular level perfectly as organizations of amino acids and metabolic balances are smashed to oblivion by natural forces eons before they would have enough tries to fit any pattern you would call life.
I would submit that someone claiming an "understanding" of all the proposed contradictory mechanisms of evolution would in fact prevent you from obtaining anything better than a tangential understanding of microbiology. I would counter that nothing about evolution makes sense in the light of biology.
Evolution = change happens. See, it predicts everything, what a powerful theory.
On