Comments by
Page 1 of 2 | Next
Posted on November 30 at 1:41 p.m.Suggest removal
I saw the mascots do their little crowd surf thing the other two times and I thought it was stupid. It didn't bother me all that much, but like Steven said, once was enough.
But Saturday I was one of the unfortunate ones to have to "pass" them along. I missed two plays as a result, one being a big third down that I would have liked to see. I was not amused. I'd much rather have watched the game I paid to see than have Boomer/Sooner's stupid butt in my face.
It's not cute. It's not funny. It's more annoying than distracting and something I don't want to have to deal with during a football game. It's not that I'm anti-fun or anti-excitement, but this isn't an NBA game. The entertainment is supposed to come from the field, not the production of events around it.
Posted on April 8 at 1:42 p.m.Suggest removal
The Texas regents gave approval though to give bonuses that totaled $44,000 to assistant coaches as if they did win the Big 12 title though.
Also, these are great:
http://soonerpsycho.com/spfarksandpic...
Posted on March 25 at 11:50 a.m.Suggest removal
So what's your point? Are you saying this tournament sucks because there's no underdogs? Or are you just trying (somehow) to make the fairly obvious point that power conference schools field better basketball teams than mid-majors?
I don't get it.
And this: "Yeah, Davidson shocked the world by making the Elite Eight last year, but there isn’t a team that can excite us beyond the top seeds this season. There is no Cinderella this year. No Davidson, Western Kentucky, George Mason, or any underdog for fans to cheer for."
So having your school in the Sweet 16 doesn't excite you? And besides, I prefer to watch great basketball. I'm incredibly excited to watch awesome matchups like Michigan State v. Kansas, UNC v. Gonzaga, OU v. Syracuse and Duke v. Nova. Those are incredible games. And every single team left (with maybe the exception of Arizona) has a realistic shot to win it all. This thing is wide open. But you'd rather have Dayton, Portland State and Cal Northridge in the Sweet 16 with all of us knowing that their run is about to end? No thanks. Lots of people are saying how boring this tourney is - I think it could be one of the best ever.
Posted on December 10 at 12:25 p.m.Suggest removal
Wait, wait, wait.
So you're saying, don't celebrate a national title yet because Florida is good? Awesome analysis.
Hopefully in a month I look back at this one like the "Texas is too good to catch" and have a chuckle.
Posted on October 27 at 7:13 p.m.Suggest removal
And maybe you should proofread next time so that you don't come off as INTELLECTUALLY stupid by spelling poorly.
Posted on October 22 at 1:57 p.m.Suggest removal
I'm sorry but I re-read it and I have to say this as well:
You say, "Also, I doubt I was the only person who wondered why Sam Bradford kept running out of the pocket. Last I checked he wasn’t Michael Vick, and I think his dogs will vouch for that too. For goodness sake, stay in the pocket. If the rush is heavy, get out and throw it away. Stop forcing throws."
According to the statistics, Sam Bradford ran the ball four times for 14 yards, one of those being a big third down conversion. So by your judgement, he should've rolled a few steps and thrown it into the second row. "Forget 14 yards and a big first down! MJ says throw it away!" Since when does MJ Casiano know more about playing quarterback at the University of Oklahoma than its greatest quarterback in school history?
I'd rather Sam run around like he's Barry Sanders on crack if that meant he was going to complete a six yard pass rather than getting nothing by throwing it out of bounds. I just honestly don't get your reasoning here.
Page 1 of 2 | Next
Posted on May 14 at 11:01 a.m.Suggest removal
You suck so much.
On