Was Jesus a real historical character? There is no reliable evidence for it - it's all hearsay, recorded (at best) decades later. It's very clear that Xian scholars over many centuries have tampered with historical documents to augment the authenticity of the story, e.g. Josephus' Testimonium Flavianum. http://www.nobeliefs.com/exist.htm
So, the most likely explanation for Jesus and the bible is plain and simple plagiarism. It's a whopper of a fairy tale that has been fooling the credulous for centuries and Kerns is a prime example of how stupid it can make some people.
Sally Kerns is a scary and dangerous person to have in any position of authority. Nicely written article, Zac - hopefully it'll wake up a few voters in time for her attempt at re-election.
Posted on October 7 at 1:32 p.m.Suggest removal
Was Jesus a real historical character? There is no reliable evidence for it - it's all hearsay, recorded (at best) decades later. It's very clear that Xian scholars over many centuries have tampered with historical documents to augment the authenticity of the story, e.g. Josephus' Testimonium Flavianum. http://www.nobeliefs.com/exist.htm
Was he a combination of earlier myths? Most probably. The Jesus story borrows many components from earlier myths. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_Ch...
So, the most likely explanation for Jesus and the bible is plain and simple plagiarism. It's a whopper of a fairy tale that has been fooling the credulous for centuries and Kerns is a prime example of how stupid it can make some people.
Sally Kerns is a scary and dangerous person to have in any position of authority. Nicely written article, Zac - hopefully it'll wake up a few voters in time for her attempt at re-election.
On