Sometime in late fall of 2009, a very good friend and colleague invited me to a resource fair that her organization was to participate in. It was late fall, I remember, because D.C. had not yet frozen over, and it was still warm enough to go without gloves. I woke up in an urban mood and had ditched the usual slacks and blazer for a more casual look: blue jeans, knee boots and a sweater. For the slight cold, I wore a black parka and a brimmed hat. Big, gold hoop earrings complemented the look.
The event was held inside the gymnasium of a neighborhood community center, which sat in the middle of Sursum Corda housing projects, the site of 14-year-old Jakhema Hansen’s murder four years prior and my weekly home visit to a 45-year-old bedridden woman who was being exploited by her family because of her lifelong housing voucher. I stopped to text my supervisor to let her know where I would be. It was a precaution implemented a few months earlier because of the raging gang war. Sursum Corda’s cul-de-sac was a scary reminder that, if something went down, there was only one way in and one way out.
When I entered, a table of chatty white women in pearls was positioned near the door of the gym. One of them noticed me, said hello and directed me to a sign-in sheet. When I finished writing my name, she handed me a paper with the word "goals" printed at the top.
I stared at the paper for two seconds, trying to make sense of what I was being asked to do. When it finally dawned on me, I smiled politely. "Oh, I'm not a client. I'm a social worker."
A second of confusion passed across her face.
"Oh, I'm sorry! You don’t have to sign on this sheet,” she said lightheartedly as she directed me to another sheet labeled "providers." She busied herself collecting brochures and business cards to add to a bag while I added my name to the growing list of clinicians visiting for the day. “Are you just here to check out some resources for your clients?"
"Yep.” I half-smiled, half-stared when I took the bag from her, deposited it to my purse.
“Great!” She extended her arm to direct me to the next stop. “Feel free to walk around!”
“Thank you.” I moved to the mouth of the gym where two white women greeted me.
“Good morning!” they said sweetly, in unison.
I smiled and opened my mouth to form the reply when one of them said. "What goals will you be working on today?"
This time, through gritted teeth and a full stare: "I'm not a client, I'm a social worker."
* * *
On my fifth day in Belize, on a sweltering June afternoon in 2011, I decided to treat myself to coffee and ice cream — a treat for surviving another summer day in the Caribbean. From the restaurant’s entry, I noticed two black women sitting on the veranda. Hell bent on making new friends, I chose a table next to theirs and pulled out the only book I’d brought for my six-week stay, "Standing at the Scratch Line," by Guy Johnson. I was on page 17 and terribly disinterested, reading the paragraphs on the page over and over. I couldn’t tell if it was the plot or the heat that kept me from reading further.
It took only five minutes for the ladies to notice me.
“Hello!” The older of the two said, smiling at me. Her accent was northeastern American. She had thick salt-and-pepper hair that was cropped around her brown face. Her skin was smooth and blue turquoise earrings dangled from her ears.
The other one smiled.
“Hi! How are you?” I lifted my sunglasses and let them rest on top of my head, squinted at the brightness.
“We’re good. You’re American? Where are you from?” The older lady asked wiping a coffee spill from her white tank top.
“I’m here from D.C., volunteering for the summer.” The waitress set a bottle of water down and I turned my head to give my order. I looked back over, and the other woman was staring off over the balcony, disinterested.
“Aaaah, I love D.C.! Where are you staying?”
“I’m with the Robinsons,” I said, pointing to my home for the summer: A two-story house built by the hands of my host parents. On the upper deck was my room, with a private bathroom and a view that overlooked all of San Ignacio.
“Oh, you here with ProWorld?” the other lady said flatly, with a heavy patois accent. She barely made eye contact when she asked the question and then let her eyes drift to her purse while she fumbled around inside for something.
“No, I’m here at Mary Open Doors. It’s a domestic violence agency run by Anna Silva.”
The woman glanced me over in silent annoyance. “Anna Silva, huh? She Belizean?”
I’d come to know ProWorld quite well, just in the week I’d been in the country. It was a service conglomerate that sent hundreds of volunteers to Belize to fill gaps left by the underfunded systems that plagued the country. Similar to organizations in the U.S. like AmeriCorps, Lutheran Social Services and Habitat for Humanity, most of these volunteers are young, privileged and educated. And white.
Just like their American counterparts in poor, urban neighborhoods, Belizeans met these service organizations with bittersweet feelings of contempt and gratitude. It’s hard to live where do-gooding white folk come and pick up where your community falls short: new playgrounds, community gardens, freshly painted schools.
And yet, there I was battling a kind of privilege I never realized I had: restraining myself from correcting Belizean children, controlling my irritation with my host family because there wasn’t enough bacon for seconds and wearing inappropriate clothes to court (a dress that landed way to far above my knees). It came out in my fear of drinking lemonade made with tap water from the house of a woman who lived in a tin shack and my outrage of a criminal justice system 50 years behind the U.S., that allowed a child sex abuser to be in the same courtroom as his eight-year-old victim.
So, I couldn’t be mad at the Belizean woman who was visibly annoyed by my presence, as I had been with the group of white women who mistook me for a client. Perhaps their misperception of me was based on how I was dressed. In the end, they were only there to do good, because others hadn’t. They only wanted to give back because of some internal mission to save or help or manage their white guilt. The same guilt I felt meeting a client whose English wasn’t strong enough to communicate her needs or watching my host family piecemeal dinner toward the end of the month while they waited for the monthly allotment for my stay. I empathized with the Belizean woman’s irritation and appreciation of me, in her country, coming to help "their people" — those unfortunate products of their environment, poor and needy.
Ajia Meux is a graduate student in Gaylord College of Journalism and Mass Communication studying strategic communication. She is a graduate of Howard University's School of Social Work.
The Daily welcomes letters to the editor and guest columns from the OU community. To submit a letter or column, email dailyopinion@ou.edu.
Post a comment as
Report
Watch this discussion.
(15) comments
Took me time to read all the comments, but I really enjoyed the article. It proved to be Very helpful to me and I am sure to all the commenters here! It’s always nice when you can not only be informed, but also entertained!
science based green detox
I really loved reading your blog. It was very well authored and easy to understand. Unlike other blogs I have read which are really not that good.Thanks alot
pure digest #10
Stunning! it is a most needed rundown by the understudies of the college as they are for the most part sitting tight for the choice. The dignitary and the chiefs are the significant experts that influence the understudies to http://kelvinwright.co.uk/ simple and more productive in their future. Expectation that the chose senior member will make the strategies for the understudies.
Mistaken identity has much more to do with attire than race. A person who is dressed as a store employee will be taken for one. A CEO dressed as a worker will be assumed to be a worker ("Undercover Boss"). A black social worker who comes into a meeting that is for social workers to help a mostly black clientele but she is dressed like a client will be taken for a client. What do you expect?
I tutor immigrants in English. We have faculty and students of all races at our community college. Depending on how I dress I can be taken for one or the other, though I am a white man of middle age.
Hi to all, the blog has really the dreadful information I really enjoyed a lot.https://onlinecasinohrvatska.com.hr
this site has so many information and great content
meridian health protocol
Like a five second search on J. Philippe Rushton tells a person all they need to know about his work and your "actual data and research."
I'm sorry this has happened to you.
https://everydayfeminism.com/2015/07/white-americans-learn-race/
You are sorry I am aware of facts? I have to guess you didn't even read the research paper. Rushton might have wrote it, but he references every source for his data. So ultimately you can't refute the IQ data I reference (truth is a persistent thing). I guess we should talk about the oppression of the NBA against Asians and Mexicans. Both have lower average heights. So before you enlightened me, I would have said well a much larger percentage of these groups don't have the height to play in the NBA. But instead I now see it is just black privilege by the NBA. Those despicable players are keeping the Mexicans and Asians down with their privilege.
Well enough of sarcasm. BTW I scanned your link for anything about IQ, there is nothing. But it is a screed against whiteness and blames whites for the fact that blacks and Hispanics don't do as well. BTW, you do realize that Asians do better in the US than white people don't you? So why doesn't the mean old bogie man, I mean white people keep these people of color down. In fact, why do evil white people let the do better than white people? The funny thing is, I'm an individualist. There are smart and dumb people of every race, group averages tell you nothing of the individual. The same is true for other traits. But all you leftists/SJWs don't want to treat individuals as individuals but as part of a group. Isn't it true, that the only reason you think there is racial oppression is the different academic and economic success of the races? That is pretty much the reason I always hear. So if you argue from a group point of view, characteristics like the average IQ of the group become relevant. But you SJWs are pathetically anti science. I hope you don't suffocate with your head in the sand. I ask you repeatedly to make an actual argument, but you can't. Are you a teaching major? nice people, but I think the lowest ACT and SAT averages on any campus. Your low ACT score is showing. Am I being mean to you, yes a little. But I am tired of your innuendo that really doesn't address the point. Thank God for my physics degree, I'd hate to be as intellectually unarmed as you are. You are lucky I don't grade any of the papers you write, they must be illogical unreasoned krap.
I'm sorry. I have been arguing from empiricism and objectivity. But then I remembered things like that are white privilege or worse. For instance math is now white privilege. The answer is political awareness in math classes. Read the drivel for yourself.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/25/professor-geometry-perpetuates-white-privilege-bec/
No, sorry. I'm not going to spend time trying to carefully refute your racist ideas. Lord knows I don't have enough songs to use as evidence like you apparently?
Honestly, though, if you really think that genetic differences between whites and blacks account for all modern social ills then I desperately hope you didn't get your degree at the University of Oklahoma. If so then we failed you.
I am not saying genetic differences are responsible for the different levels of success you see for the various races and ethnic groups. IQ undoubtedly is a combination of both genes and environment. I only brought up genetics because many SJWs try to claim there is no genetic component.
But my point is the different levels of success are tied to IQ averages for the different groups. For instance, the smartest ethnic group is Ashkenazi Jews with an average iQ of 115, they are only 4% of the population, but they are over represented in Law, Medicine, etc. The reason you don't refute what I say about the IQs of the different groups is because you can't refute facts. Below is a link to an article by Rushton and Jensen discussing this in Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2005, Vol. 11, No. 2, 235–294. I just put in the Rush song because it so clearly exposes the evil of forced equality when the people or trees involved are not equal. But little boy or girl, I can back up anything I state as a fact with actual data and research. So read, weep or refute. Here is a fact I'd like you to refute from the research/survey paper. "The study also found that the average IQ for African Americans was
lower than those for Latino, White, Asian, and Jewish Americans (85, 89, 103,
106, and 113, respectively; Herrnstein & Murray, 1994, pp. 273–278)." You will notice the group averages are actually better for whites and Asians than I stated but a little less for the Jews. But please point me to an article saying these averages are differnet.
https://www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
Sheesh, how does one respond to this much crazy? 4chan namedropping, "cuck" usage, and woefully misinformed ideas about race. This post has it all!
Instead my man let me suggest this class schedule for you for the spring '18 semester:
Introduction to African and African-American Studies, 3 credits, m/w at 1:30, f at 8am (sorry, I know that'll be a rough early wakeup time.)
Introduction to Sociology, 3 credits, t/tr at 12, w at 1:30
Introduction Mathematical Statistics, m/w at 8:30.
That's only nine hours, leaving you three away from a full schedule! Lucky you! Maybe take something fun, we'd hate for you to get burnt out on school and lead an ignorant, close-minded, and misinformed life. That would be an awfully disappointing waste of a person.
Well disappointed, all I can say is not an argument. Since I have a doctorate, I won't bother taking fluff classes or the statistics class. I already completed a calculus based statistics class at OU. i have no idea what you think statistics would do to alter any of the facts I presented. I assume all this is going towards my IQ comments. Maybe you should research IQ in the library or take a psychology class. BTW, within the last year they have found genes that are related to IQ. This is not surprising since high IQ people have faster conduction of the neural signals. Something like that would have to be at least partly genetic. So if you have a point make it, but then you are likely a millennial and have more indoctrination than information.
You are probably too young to know Rush songs. Below are the lyrics for The Trees. I have no idea if they had modern PC culture/anti white thinking in mind, but it fits. It is about trees claiming oppression because of genetic differences. The same kind of BS blacks are guilty of when they wonder why they are not represented proportionately in high IQ jobs. But when only about 20% of blacks have an IQ of 100 or higher and whites and Asians have at least 50% of their population wiht an IQ above 100, that explains the entire disparity. But make arguments if you don't agree, don't act like a twerp.
There is unrest in the forest,
There is trouble with the trees,
For the maples want more sunlight
And the oaks ignore their pleas.
The trouble with the maples,
(And they're quite convinced they're right)
They say the oaks are just too lofty
And they grab up all the light.
But the oaks can't help their feelings
If they like the way they're made.
And they wonder why the maples
Can't be happy in their shade.
There is trouble in the forest,
And the creatures all have fled,
As the maples scream, "Oppression"
And the oaks just shake their heads
So the maples formed a union
And demanded equal rights.
They say, "The oaks are just too greedy;
We will make them give us light."
Now there's no more oak oppression,
For they passed a noble law,
And the trees are all kept equal
By hatchet, axe, and saw.
After laying out a premise based on personal experience alone, arguing facts by simply calling the presenter "crazy' is a poor model for debate and as sure as the earth is spinning, a poor way to get a point across.
So you show up at a resource fair dressed "urban" instead of professional and then get upset because people didn't know you were a professional. That is all on you and has nothing to do with privilege. Do people judge us on our looks, sure, but you knew that before your incident.
Then you go on to assume that it is likely your fellow white social workers have whtie guilt. I think that is likely. Universities and the media have been preaching that for decades. But I have bad news for you, except for all the white cucks brainwashed in college, we are over it. There is no need for guilt from me or any other white person living for the actions of those in the past. As 4chan has declared, it is okay to be white. Go peddle your privilege BS to someone that is gullible.
All of the difference in outcomes between the races as groups can be traced back to a group characteristic called average IQ. It is not surprising that the group called black people does not do as well as whites in our society. They have an average group IQ of 85. So in our society that values and needs intelligence to perform most of the jobs, why is it surprising that Asians do the best in the US with an average group (Q of 104. Whites with our so called privilege come in second but then they are second in average group IQ with 100. And before you talk about mean old America and slavery One thing is for sure, being transported here and living here has lead the US black IQs averaging 15 points (one whole standard deviation) more than their sub Saharan relatives. The only privilege whites have today is their higher average group IQ. That makes the two racial groups perform disparately.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.