81.0
Saturday, May 26, 2012
Non-discrimination update passed
by   |  February 22, 2010  |  

photo

Marcin Rutkowski/The Daily

The UOSA Graduate Student Senate passed a bill to amend OU’s non-discrimination policy that would protect gay, lesbian and transgender students Sunday night.

The bill, however, does not state “gay, lesbian and transgender,” but recommends that “personal expressions of sexualities” be added to the OU Board of Regents Equal Opportunity Statement.

“This has taken two years guys, I think we ought to applaud [the passage of the bill] heartily,” said Susan Adams-Johnson, Senate chairwoman.

The legislation should please Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgendered and Friends and other groups, said Derrell Cox Senate secretary.

“There are other issues that affect people [besides sexual expression], such as gender expression and gender identity,” Cox said.

No senators voted against the bill.

The resolution will next be heard by the UOSA Undergraduate Student Congress.

“I’m happy for it to pass, we’ll see how it goes through (the) Undergrad Congress,” Cox said. “It has some significant obstacles to be overcome to be heard by the [OU Board of Regents].”

Cox said the bill was influenced by a UOSA Rep. Shayna Daitch’s resolution, but that it had been changed significantly.

For that reason, Cox said, she was not named as a co-author of the bill.

“It has the potential to really influence people’s lives for the good,” Cox said.

Comments

The Oklahoma Daily is pleased to provide you the opportunity to share your thoughts about this article. We encourage lively debate on the issues of the day, but we ask you refrain from using profanity or other offensive speech, engaging in personal attacks or name-calling, posting advertising, or straying from the topic at hand. To comment, you must be a registered user of OUDaily.com. Thanks for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Log in | Register

soonerboomers 2 years, 3 months ago

Taking two years for something that should have taken a week is not a reason for applause; it is a reason for embarrassment.

0