88.0
Friday, May 25, 2012
Campus assault fuels concealed carry debate
by   |  February 18, 2009  |  

photo

House Bill 1083 would allow Counsel of Law Enforcement and Education Training (CLEET) certified persons and professors with concealed carry licenses to carry concealed firearms on campus. Photo illustration by James Cornwell/The Daily.

The debate over the legalization of concealed weapons on Oklahoma college campuses is heating up after Friday afternoon, when an OU professor was attacked in Kaufman Hall by an armed former student.

Advocates for both sides of the argument say the attack represents why their point of view is correct.

Last spring the debate temporarily was silenced when Sens. Johnny Crutchfield, D-Ardmore, and Mike Johnson, R-Kingfisher, decided not to put a bill that would allow concealed carry on campus on the agenda of a state Senate committee, effectively killing it.

But the author of that bill, Rep. Jason Murphey, R-Guthrie, has proposed a similar bill this session. He said Friday’s attack is a prime example of why people with specific training should be allowed to carry concealed weapons on college campuses.

“It’s a case in point,” he said.

Murphey’s proposal, House Bill 1083, would allow college professors with concealed carry licenses to have concealed weapons on campus. It also has a provision that would allow those who have been throuh the Council on Law Enforcement and Education Training certification process, largely current and former law enforcement and military personnel, to carry concealed weapons on college campuses.

Before Murphey’s proposal was killed last year, several state higher education officials, including OU President David Boren, publicly denounced the bill, saying it would be unsafe to allow weapons on campuses.

Murphey said that higher education officials used propaganda to “demonize” members of the military last spring, but he doesn’t think they will be able to do the same to professors this year.

“It’s hard for higher ed. [officials] to demonize teachers,” he said.

Boren, however, said he still believes guns should not be allowed on OU’s campuses. He also said Friday’s incident is an example of why guns should be banned on campus, unless they are in the hands of professional law enforcement officers.

Boren said the attacker did not fire his gun in the incident, but if other people in the area also had weapons, the outcome could have been different.

“I think [it is] just another example of why this [concealed carry] isn’t a good idea,” he said. “In this situation it sure wouldn’t have helped things.”

Murphey said this year’s proposal might suffer the same fate as last year’s — if it is not heard by a House committee it will not make it to the House floor.

Even if the bill does pass through the House, the Senate may refuse to hear it based on the fact that a similar bill already has been killed in committee.

That bill was proposed by Sen. Randy Bass, D-Lawton, and would have allowed law enforcement officials who have been through training with the Council on Law Enforcement Education and Training to have concealed weapons on campuses.

Bass’ bill might not have affected OU much, though, because members of the OUPD already are allowed to carry weapons on campus. Current Oklahoma laws allow college presidents to give permission to individuals to carry concealed weapons.

Bass said he is not in favor of allowing anybody but trained law enforcement officials to carry weapons on college campuses.

Comments

The Oklahoma Daily is pleased to provide you the opportunity to share your thoughts about this article. We encourage lively debate on the issues of the day, but we ask you refrain from using profanity or other offensive speech, engaging in personal attacks or name-calling, posting advertising, or straying from the topic at hand. To comment, you must be a registered user of OUDaily.com. Thanks for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Log in | Register

mfhayes 3 years, 3 months ago

They want a picture of something you can't see.

Good luck!

0

legalese04 3 years, 3 months ago

The picture used with this article is a horrible example of concealing a firearm. For the most part the general public should never be able to tell when an individual is exercising their CCW permit until a situation might arise when that individual feels the need that the weapon should be used.

0

mfhayes 3 years, 3 months ago

Haha, "DATS NOT HOW U CURRY A GUNNNNN!!!"

0

Curter 3 years, 3 months ago

GAH! For a college newspaper that many journalism students take part in, at least LOOK UP the FACTS before you post up INACCURATE pictures like these!

0

hillelkkiller89 3 years, 3 months ago

It is actually a law that if you are carrying a concealed weapon, it must be CONCEALED, in a holster and out of view of the public. That is the law. Pictures like this are what cause people to have negative views about concealed carry laws and think that those that posses a license have little regard for public safety. If you want an accurate picture of a person carrying a concealed weapon, pick one where it is concealed, not slung in your waistband like some kind of criminal.

0