Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins delivered a lecture on the illusion of intentional purpose in nature on March 6 at McCasland Field House.
Earlier that week, Rep. Todd Thomsen, R-Ada, authored two resolutions apropos of Dawkins’ lecture.
These resolutions opposed Dawkins’ invitation to speak because of his “intolerance for cultural diversity and diversity of thinking,” and condemned the University of Oklahoma for engaging in “one-sided indoctrination” in service of the “unproven and unpopular” theory of evolution.
After this failed to prevent Dawkins from speaking, the Oklahoma Legislature launched an investigation, demanding that OU hand over copies of all e-mails and other communications relating to the event, identify all entities who had provided funding for the event and present a complete itemization of costs related to the talk, down to the printing of the one-page posters that had been taped up around campus.
What is the Legislature expecting to find? There’s been nothing to suggest financial malfeasance occurred during the coordination of the lecture.
In fact, Dawkins waived his usual speaking fee and, while at OU, spontaneously decided to donate $5,000 to Oklahomans for Excellence in Science Education.
However, even if OU had paid Dawkins thousands of dollars of state funds, it would not have been improper.
The only actions here that suggest impropriety are those of the Oklahoma Legislature.
There is no reason to suspect illegal actions behind the Dawkins lecture.
The Legislature does not suspect illegal actions behind the Dawkins lecture. What the Legislature hopes to do is intimidate OU’s administrators out of hosting similar events in the future.
Thankfully, however, this pseudo-McCarthyite “investigation” seems to have failed as miserably as Thomsen’s prior resolutions.
OU President David Boren has barely acknowledged the Legislature’s histrionics, much less indicated that he intends to alter OU’s policies on the basis of them.
Those OU faculty who have spoken on the Legislature’s actions have done so with concern and annoyance.
Even Dawkins took a few minutes out of his lecture to poke fun at Thomsen’s resolutions.
But the ineffectuality of these efforts should not distract from the fact that they are dishonest, bullying attempts to scare OU students and faculty out of exercising their right to free speech.
Thomsen objected to Dawkins’ presence at OU because Dawkins’ “published statements on the theory of evolution and opinion about those who do not believe in the theory are contrary and offensive to the views and opinions of most citizens of Oklahoma.”
What would the solution to this be, I wonder?
If OU is not to promote views that oppose those of most Oklahomans, perhaps we should set up polling booths around the state so that we know how to revise our textbooks.
Does the Oklahoman public support evolution or creation? Geosyncline theory or plate tectonics? Ptolemaic or Copernican cosmology? I can’t wait to see the results!
Or perhaps Thomsen should just take up residence at OU so that he can vet every single thing that goes into our curriculum.
Thomsen’s assessment of evolution as “unproven and unpopular” is borderline insane.
Evolution by natural selection is accepted by all but an infinitesimal fringe of biologists, and is as well-substantiated as, say, Copernican cosmology.
I’d rather not burn up the rest of this column reiterating the proof of the theory of evolution’s veracity and widespread acceptance, but interested readers might check out my previous column, “Fundamentalist doctrine does not belong in schools,” or, more to the point, a biology textbook.
Thomsen also objected to Dawkins being allowed to speak because “his presence at OU was not about science,” but “to promote an atheistic agenda.”
Dawkins’ lecture was on the subject of biology, not theology. Posters advertising the talk didn’t even announce Dawkins as the author of “The God Delusion.”
The only people to broach the subject of Dawkins’ atheism were audience members during the Q&A session and Todd Thomsen himself.
Again, one wonders what Thomsen would propose as a solution. Should atheists be forbidden to speak at OU, even on topics unrelated to their atheism?
If Thomsen disagrees with some of Dawkins’ assertions, he should argue against them in a way that helps enrich public discourse. After all, as a state representative, he has the ability to communicate his arguments to millions of Oklahomans.
I wish my own soapbox were so high!
Instead, Thomsen has tried to bully those who disagree with him into silence. In doing so, he displays the frailty of his own convictions.
Again and again, fundamentalist state representatives like Thomsen, Rebecca Hamilton (who helped spearhead the “investigation” of the Dawkins lecture) and Anita Bryant clone Sally Kern have shown that, in Oklahoma, politicians can engage in displays of mind-bending ignorance and suffer no ill effects so long as they pay lip service to Christianity.
It was right and appropriate for OU to invite world-renowned biologist and science writer Richard Dawkins to speak.
It was wrong and stupid of Thomsen et al to try to interfere. Boren is better qualified to run OU than Thomsen.
-Zac Smith is an English junior.
The Oklahoma Daily is pleased to provide you the opportunity to share your thoughts about this article. We encourage lively debate on the issues of the day, but we ask you refrain from using profanity or other offensive speech, engaging in personal attacks or name-calling, posting advertising, or straying from the topic at hand. To comment, you must be a registered user of OUDaily.com. Thanks for taking the time to offer your thoughts.
You must be logged in to leave a comment. Log in | Register
KatjaE 3 years, 1 month ago
Very nicely done, Zac. It's great to see some decent writing in this paper for a change.
And congratulations on all the nice comments here: http://richarddawkins.net/article,3731,n,n
mythman 3 years, 1 month ago
"i guess Okla's citizens want folks that think like/represent Okla's citizens..........."
Which doesn't say good things about Oklahoma's citizens. If such bigotry and oppression is allowed a free pass, then it's the citizens themselves that are going against the very principals that America was founded on.
Flips88 3 years, 1 month ago
This may have been topical 5 weeks ago. Now it is not. Write something relevant for once, for all our sakes.
bobrussell1957 3 years, 1 month ago
Bravo Zac....
mikedavis 3 years, 1 month ago
Richard Dawkins is a saint.
kdbp1213 3 years, 1 month ago
rogerg, Okla's Congress is full of folks that were elected by Okla's citizens. i guess Okla's citizens want folks that think like/represent Okla's citizens...........
TTown 3 years, 1 month ago
I beg to differ. If we forget what was attempted and don't remember we may forget when they attempt this type of control again..and believe me... they will. We have the most regressive, narrowminded, 'holier than thou' legislature actively attempting to force Oklahoma to NOT think.
mindhypnotized 3 years, 1 month ago
Who cares if it isn't "topical"? Important issues don't cater to your sense of popularity, or anyone else's for that matter. This is exactly the kind of writing I like to see in our paper. The only way to keep the Fundies from destroying America's scientific prestige is to raise awareness of how baseless the majority of arguments against evolutionary theory really are. I really hope there are more intelligent and informed young writers (i.e., free from religious prejudice) like this one at the Daily. Keep up the good work!
RogerG 3 years, 1 month ago
Our State house is full of idiots and bible thumping fanatics. They think the Earth is flat. They want to burn anyone who has science based arguments. For them,any way of thinking that is opposed to their blind faith Bible based information is a danger to their 19th century belief systems. These people are our own Equivalent of the Wahabists of Saudi Arabia and the Taleban..