35.0
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
FRIDAY FACE-OFF: Should athletes have a mandatory curfew?

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Yes

For a Division I college athlete, being in the wrong place at the wrong time can have huge consequences, not only for the athlete, but for the athletic program and the entire school.

Football defensive end Frank Alexander and basketball guard Ray Willis both suffered knife wounds in an altercation that occurred at about 2:30 a.m. last Sunday at the Sooner Knights club in Norman.

The story made the front page headline list on ESPN.com earlier this week, giving the University of Oklahoma some national publicity, but for all the wrong reasons.

Like it or not, athletes are the most visible representatives of this university, and when they are anywhere near trouble, a lot of people are going to hear about it.

In order to minimize incidents like the one that happened Sunday, I believe athletes should be subject to a 2 a.m. curfew.

In a perfect world, student-athletes would not need to be treated differently than any other student. However, the reality is when an athlete gets in a fight, it affects others far more than if I were to get into the same fight.

And while it is not always the athletes’ fault when altercations happen, it makes little difference in the news reports that simply tell the public an OU athlete got into a fight.

Athletes are like celebrities in their college towns. Fame brings a number of things, not all of them positive. Fame and popularity also bring jealousy and scrutiny.

Jealousy mixed with a few drinks and a quick temper at 3 a.m. in a crowded club can result in disaster for an athlete’s career and a program’s image.

I understand that no one wants to be put under a curfew. But I feel 2 a.m. leaves enough time to enjoy the night but is also early enough to avoid some the trouble that often happens in the early hours of the morning.

It is a small price to pay for the well being of the athletes, and for the image of the university as a whole.

— Aaron Colen is a journalism junior.

No

When news broke that defensive end Frank Alexander and basketball guard Ray Willis were stabbed outside a party Sunday night, the whispers calling for a mandatory curfew for student-athletes were already starting.

“You see, nothing good happens to players after midnight.”

“Stoops and Capel need to get control of their boys.”

But before everybody starts assuming that these athletes emulate the lifestyle of Adam “Pacman” Jones (and yes, he is still Pacman), people need to realize most athletes do the right things the right way. Holding these guys on a leash is not the answer.

You can’t put in any kind of curfew just because of a single incident. Believe it or not, athletes are not getting stabbed or shot every weekend. It’s those few times when it does happen that it catches everyone’s attention. The news never covers when athletes go out and come home safely. One freak moment should not affect every athlete on campus.

Last I checked, OU is still a university. Part of the university experience is the freedom to be on your own and to live by your own schedule. So if the freshmen in university housing do not have a curfew, how can anyone justify a curfew for these student-athletes? The athletes here are grown men and women and do not need a babysitter.

Then comes the whole issue of who would actually control the curfew. If Stoops sets up a midnight weekday curfew, are the assistant coaches going to take a post in front of each door? Will OUPD have to hire more police officers to roam the athletic dorms? The answer is obviously “no” and I don’t think the honor system applies here either.

The advocates of a curfew system will point out that no one gets stabbed outside the library and that this curfew would protect OU’s biggest financial assets.

But people, let’s face facts. This is Norman, Oklahoma. The same dangers that lurk outside a night club in L.A. or a strip club in Las Vegas do not apply here. If some guys want to go out, odds are they won’t get mugged, whether at a party or in front of Bizzell.

To all the whisperers, this was an unusual incident. This is not the norm. Violent parties are not the issue at OU and players do not need a curfew.

— Zein Jivani is a broadcast and electronic media sophomore

Comments

You know, airplanes aren't blown up every weekend, but they still X-Ray bags before they put them on a plane.

Students don't die of alchol poisoning in their frat house every weekend, but OU is a dry campus because it happened once.

Students don't get shot at organizational meetings past midnight everytime, but a faculity adviser now has to be there because it happened once.

Posted by anonymous / senatorfoss on September 5, 2008 at 2:01 p.m.

What next u gonna put bars on our rooms and tell us when we can sleep and stuff. The price we already pay for being an athlete is high enough ( if u realize the kind of commitment and discipline it takes to achieve success ). Plz donot take the little we have left. does anybody respect civil rights anymore. Since all the college athletes r atleast 18 yrs old, so mature enough to know actions have consequences. Why am i feeling stalin is going to rise in USA, seems like my parents haven't left russia that far :(

Posted by anonymous / max_syt on September 7, 2008 at 2:24 p.m.

also the whole thing stinks of coverup, else why the people at the party r forbidden to talk to the presss.

Posted by anonymous / max_syt on September 7, 2008 at 2:25 p.m.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Share